Replies excluded. Include replies
-
@Cennydd Or rather, laminate it.
-
@seacue At least it didn’t say that for floor 9!
-
@romainst You can certainly use text in a sentence. It’s more when you’re branding a section or piece of content that the bird will suffice.
-
@gilbertlara Cool – mich closer. Spacing around the bird feels a little tight. Any chance of somehow giving him more room?
-
@romainst You could also try something similar to our own lockups (no Twitter text): support.twitter.com
-
@romainst You could if you absolutely had to, but try to avoid placing bird and generic word next to each other.
-
@oul That will get fixed soon – not everything could go out in one batch. Thanks for the patience.
-
@romainst No more text. The bird is all you need.
-
@gilbertlara See the version that appears in our buttons about 1/4 down the page: twitter.com/about/logos
-
@815media Looking sharp already. Thanks.
-
@didierh Quick work!
-
@Mathewh Cheers, Matthew.
-
@Mathewh Not everything can be changed at once. That page, too, will be changed soon though.
-
@mattconvente Don’t know about a deadline yet. I can’t speak officially, but I think we just want you to convert over as soon as you can.
-
Thanks and mad props to @bigchaz and @briggles for their beautiful video introducing the new #Twitterbird:
-
RT @jasonsantamaria: I’ve always loved this point of view from Paul Rand on logo redesigns: gim.ie/KMo3 /cc @stop
-
@LittleUK @jack Yes, thanks. Coming in another update later today for technical reasons.
-
@teagadinho Yes, over time.
-
@JplusCplusM That resource takes longer to update for technical reasons. It’ll get there.
-
@jayrobinson It will grow on you over time too.
-
@shaneadams Ouch. However, all the old t-shirts and stuff around the office now are collector’s items.
-
@gilbertlara Says who? Have you seen the adjustments we made to it for small sizes?
-
@trammell Awesome. Period.
-
@TimHaines Typically, it should be blue. Though some circumstances will want to avoid color.
-
Taking flight… Starting today you’ll begin to notice a simplified Twitter bird. blog.twitter.com/2012/06/taking… #TwitterBird
-
Fantastic interview with Flipboard’s head of Design, @marumushi mashable.com/2012/06/05/fli…
-
@dbedingfield Seriously. That article still says Promoted Friends.
-
@kvanscha I’ve done that before. Very unnerving.
-
Promoted Friends, eh? Nice editing slip. cl.ly/3Z3M2r091N0v31… forbes.com/sites/jeffberc…
-
@bigchaz Totally.
-
Glaser’s “Less is Not Necessarily More’ is one of the points in Ten Things I Have Learned [PDF] miltonglaser.com/files/Essays-1…
-
@jillyface @zoefinkel Only if you’re typing emails on that thing, scanning them in, then sending as an attachment.
-
Milton Glaser’s “just enough is more” elaborated in “Can We Please Move Past Apple’s Silly, Faux-Real UIs?” fastcodesign.com/1669879/can-we…
-
@jillyface @zoefinkel Oh, forgive me. That’s just how wide double-spaces look. Could drive a truck through those spaces, with doors open. ;)
-
@zoefinkel Farhad would consider @jillyface a renegade, because what I read from her today had 3 (!) spaces between sentences.
-
@wooitstreja What does the @ symbol have to do with “Stop wanting…”?
-
@cameronmoll @alexgiron Yes – we’re very excited about the prospects and what lies ahead for us all. cc @martymadrid
-
Big day for Twitter @design today.
-
@suzannelong That may still be a thing (I don’t know for sure). Perhaps @capnwiley can help clarify.
-
@suzannelong Unsure about archiving. The Help center provides info on deactivating an account: support.twitter.com/articles/87894…
-
@mhj Agreed. It’s knowing whether someone rational is listening,
-
@mhj So for the ones who do respond (or to which you’ve apologized) does or make you think twice if you know another human is listening?
-
@mhj Nah. I’ve seen many customers backpedal and even apologize after a human follows up with them.
-
@smcbride And to your point, the humanization of business as well.
-
@smcbride Exactly. The publicness of the rant and followup is key.
-
@chrisdasie No problem. Use away.
-
@Bretton Some review services allow (or force?) updating of a previous review, rather than adding a second diluted review.